[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request

From: Jeroen Dekkers
Subject: Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:51:54 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:23:15PM +0100, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> * [Wolfgang J?hrling] 
> > might even introduce a security problem. Thus we would need to recompile
> > all programs anyway. I can't see the point of having binary
> > compatiblity then.
> If a user just wants to play Quake V or Duke Nukem Forever, he might not
> need to care about PATH_MAX, as these programs will most likely only
> open trusted files.

Then we recompile it. Oh, I don't care about non-free software at all.

Jeroen Dekkers
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

Attachment: pgpN0gSi79IWq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]