[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: n-hurd networking
From: |
Simon Law |
Subject: |
Re: n-hurd networking |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:30:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 01:14:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Ok, so the subhurd question (different from collectives).
>
> It seems clear to me that each subhurd should have a separate IP
> address, and that they should use net filters so that they keep out of
> each other's way. They should ignore incoming IP or ARP packets not
> concerned with their own IP address. This is almost adequate. It
> doesn't deal with packets from one subhurd to another on the same
> machine. I think the best thing to deal with that is to have the
> kernel device automatically loop back such packets.
Ooh. That seems like a potentially bad solution. You're going
to have trouble with non TCP/IP protocols if you do it this way. Please
don't mix datalink and network protocols, that will just get ugly.
Simon
- n-hurd networking, Hisham Kotry, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, James Morrison, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking,
Simon Law <=
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
Re: n-hurd networking, Niels Möller, 2002/08/07