[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uname -s and naming confusion
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: uname -s and naming confusion |
Date: |
25 Oct 2002 15:36:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Tom Hart <hartte13@BrandonU.CA> writes:
> Doesn't a lot of this confusion come from:
>
> 1. No enforced standardization of terminology.
>
> The GNU project uses the term "operating system" to refer to the
> complete *usable* system, ie. GNU, GNU/Hurd, GNU/Linux, and "kernel"
> to refer to the kernel, ie. Linux, Hurd/Mach, Hurd/L4, etc., whereas
> the BSD people say "operating system == kernel".
Yes. So what I'm saying is "Let's not add to the confusion. Let's at
least try and keep all the variants of the GNU system compatible in
their use of terminology."
- Re: uname -s, (continued)
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Jeff Bailey, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/31
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/31
Re: uname -s, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/10/24
Re: uname -s, Jon Mason, 2002/10/24