[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug#169251: patch for GNU/Hurd

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: Bug#169251: patch for GNU/Hurd
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:29:13 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:45:18AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > But the bits about OCRNL, TABDLY and TAB3 seems to be wrong.  They're
> > all required by POSIX.
> I didn't know that. Well, in any case they're features we don't have
> yet. When they are implemented the code will recompile with them
> with no problem so IMHO it'd be ok.
> I'm CCing to bug-hurd as they might be unaware of those missing features

This is in fact two bugs: First, glibc headers need to define those symbols,
irregardless where they are implemented and supported or not.  So please
file a bug against glibc.  It would be nice to include all missing symbols
from termios there.

Then we should implement them in the term translator.  You could do it, it
isn't too hard, especially something like OCRNL.  This is an independent bug
against the Hurd, I will add it to the task list.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]