[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
From: |
M. Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:05:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
Quoting "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>:
> Was there any agreement on how to procced with fixing the 1GB limit?
> The discussion died of after Marcus reposted a discussion about not
> mapping the whole disk to memory.
>
> Here are the archives of the threads:
> http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/hurd-devel/2002q4/000135.html
> http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/hurd-devel/2002q1/000223.html
This thread is also relevant in the discussion:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/hurd-devel/2001q4/000134.html
I wonder what ideas Neal had, I couldn't find a thread where he described his
ideas.
An advantage of Rolands solution to the problem that it makes it easy to
implement ordered writes (Or am I really confused?). I still don't understand
Thomas' solution, what will the implementation look like? The filesystem can
map a mapping window, and simply use it? Another thing I wonder: Why do memory
objects have a maximum size of 4GB? Isn't it possible to create a memory object
with the size of the entire store and use mapping windows? (Or am I confused
again? :)). Can someone please describe how this works in more detail if I'm
wrong? I assume more people are confused by this.
thanks,
Marco Gerards
- 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/05
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.,
M. Gerards <=
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06