[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
From: |
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver |
Subject: |
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:34:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:46:13PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:05:13AM +0100, M. Gerards wrote:
> > Another thing I wonder: Why do memory
> > objects have a maximum size of 4GB? Isn't it possible to create a memory
> > object
> > with the size of the entire store and use mapping windows? (Or am I
> > confused
> > again? :)). Can someone please describe how this works in more detail if
> > I'm
> > wrong? I assume more people are confused by this.
>
> The reason for the limit is because the address space on IA32 architecture
> is 32 bit. Now, you _could_ of course change the kernel interfaces to allow
> for larger memory objects and only limit mapping windows to 4gb. This might
Or you could just use a 64bit machine such as an alpha ? :)
Always looking for a hardware solution to a software problem,
p2.
- 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/05
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., M. Gerards, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.,
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <=
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Joshua Judson Rosen, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08