[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:30:14 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:44:36AM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> PING ( 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=2.0 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=5.1 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4.2 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=5.0 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=1.2 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1.2 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=4.5 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=4.4 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=4.3 ms
> 64 bytes from icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=4.2 ms
> When I flood ping GNUmach2 I get 1% loss and no package loss with 
> GNUmach1. Maybe we can spur some interest in tuning these numbers
> a bit?

It's hard to believe you get no package loss in GNU Mach 1. Do you flood
the GNU/Hurd box from a GNU/Linux box?  I have seen horrible package loss in
that situation, which was much better with GNUMach v2.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]