[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fatfs virtual inodes

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: fatfs virtual inodes
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 17:06:18 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 11:17:38PM +0200, M. Gerards wrote:
> The biggest problem of the old code is that the old structures are not 
> removed.
> And this code works more optimal than the old one (I assume). I'm still
> increasing the number, but that doesn't harm us because unused numbers are not
> in the table anymore, that could happen with the old version. A huge gap could
> be created by removing all files except the last for example.

Right.  Well, the old code was just written the way it was because I wanted
to try out if virtual inodes work out ok, and didn't want to worry abour
> Do you want me to improve this patch as you suggested or do you think this is
> useless?

By all means, please!  It's the way to go.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]