Re: GNU Mach 1.3 and gcc 3.3.x

[Marco Gerards]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:

>    What about maintaining a 1.3 branch?  It works really stable here
>    so I use GNUMach 1.3.
> 
> I would happily do that since I consider the GNU Mach 2.x crap.
> 
> Oh, and might note that my patch is incomplete, I found a couple of
> weird errors that I don't have the time to fix right now, will do that
> later this or next week.

If I have the time I will have a look at the floppy size problem.
Perhaps the serial stuff as well. (all for 1.3).

Thanks,
Marco