[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumach: spl.h vs machspl.h

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Subject: Re: Gnumach: spl.h vs machspl.h
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:56:35 -0800

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:39 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi again folks,
> OK, I am confused by something else. (I know big surprise :-) ).
> i386/i386/spl.h
>     #include ipl.h
> i386/i386/ipl.h
>     #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
>     #include <i386/machspl.h>
> ...
> i386/i386/machspl.h
>     /* XXX replaced by... */
>     #include <i386/spl.h>
> First question is, is this an issue?  machspl.h doesn't seem to have any 
> #ifdef _I386_MACHSPL_H_ wrapper around it.
> Second question, is: Should machspl.h just be dropped and replace all 
> instances with spl.h?

Perhaps the reason for having the different files is to accommodate
device drivers that were written for different kernels?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]