[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 4

From: Barry deFreese
Subject: Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 4
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:10:29 -0500

----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: "Barry deFreese" <bddebian@comcast.net>
Cc: <bug-hurd@gnu.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 4


Barry deFreese, le Sun 12 Nov 2006 21:19:06 -0500, a écrit :
OK, I was working on a much bigger patch but got hung up on some of the
chario / tty stuff.  So I am sending what I have for now.

Ah, I misread it, so that patch was not so big, I commited most of it
(the obvious part).

  * i386/i386at/model_dep.h  New file

  * kern/debug.c  Include new i386at/model_dep.h
  * kern/mach_clock.c  New includes:
    * i386at/model_dep.h

This poses problem.  We can't ask the kernel part to include some
i386-specific part.  For such things we have the machine/ symlink, but
it points to i386/i386/, not i386/i386at/ .  Any thoughts on this?



Thanks, I thought about that too. Unfortunately I'm not quite skilled enough yet to get the differences between what's in i386/ vs i386at/ .



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]