[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building glibc from CVS

From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: Building glibc from CVS
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:23:51 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i


On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:05:03AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> ../sysdeps/generic/rtld-lowlevel.h:1:2: error: #error "Lowlevel 
> primitives for ld.so not implemented"

This is already reported at

> Should we have an rtld-lowlevel.h (I don't see one on any other archs), 
> or should we be implementing a sysdep dependent ldsodefs.h instead of 
> using generic/?

The only `rtld-lowlevel.h' implementation I'm aware of is the
`nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rtld-lowlevel.h' one.  So, yes, we need a
non-nptl implementation.  Whether this can then be generically usable or
will rather be system-dependent and living inside `sysdeps/' has to be


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]