[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: notify_no_senders oddity

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Subject: Re: notify_no_senders oddity
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:06:55 -0800

On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
> There's something I don't understand in
> i386/i386at/i386at_ds_routines.c:ds_notify()
>       dev = (device_t) ns->not_header.msgh_remote_port;
> How a port can be a device_t?

A device_t is just a mach_port_t that is expected to be talking to
something that implements the Mach device protocol.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]