[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Subject: Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:29:31 -0700

On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 14:52 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:

>  * Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and
> its
>  * documentation is hereby granted, provided that both the copyright
>  * notice and this permission notice appear in all copies of the
>  * software, derivative works or modified versions, and any portions
>  * thereof, and that both notices appear in supporting documentation.

Sorry, I took your word for it when I sholudn't have.

Nothing here, which you attribute to UU, contains the noxious
advertising clause.

I do recall that such files did once exist, but this notice is not it.
Notice, you see, that it does not refer to advertising.

If there are such notices, can you please post one?  I can ask Utah
about it, and my guess is that this is all old enough that they won't
care at all, and will happily follow BSD's example and allow its


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]