[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Defualt socket server overriding

From: Neal H. Walfield
Subject: Re: Defualt socket server overriding
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:20:12 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:09:45 +0800,
Wei Shen wrote:
> I still think there are ways to solve this problem. For example, the fs
> server can add an virtual root argument to the passive translator, and the
> translator (which we trust) will later add this virtual root to any path
> argument provided by the chroot process.

How does it know the process is chroot'ed?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]