[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Requesting for review of the Draft proposal for - procfs

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Requesting for review of the Draft proposal for - procfs
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:11:07 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)


Sorry for the late reply...

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:07:15AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:

> I have submitted a totally reworked proposal through Google Web App.
> [...]

> The project thus aims at making the GNU/Linux process management tools
> like ps, top, vmstat, sysctl, w, kill, skill, nice, snice, pgrep,
> free, tload, uptime, fuser, killall, pidof, pstree, etc., to run out
> of the box.

Not all of these listed ar actually relevant -- see the other discussion
on that topic...

>    To begin with, I would be migrating existing procfs code which uses
>    libtrivfs, to use libnetfs throughout procfs.

BTW, this is not really relavant to your application, but I guess I can
mention it nevertheless: Instead of first moving the existing translator
to libnetfs, and then working on the individual functionalities, it
might be a better idea to start with a libnetfs-based skeleton only
first, and move over individual functionalities one by one as you are
working on them... But that's just an idea to consider; I'm not even
sure it's really the best approach :-)

The remaining stuff I think we already have discussed in the other
thread :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]