[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New machine for shitbox

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: New machine for shitbox
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:39:59 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
> On 7/5/08, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> >  On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> >  for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
> >  Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
> >  distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
> Maybe using web caching software like memcached[1] can help minimize
> disk access, as wiki content could be served from memory and only
> updates would hit the database triggering a cache update.

The problem is _not_ serving, it is updating.

If the cpu is 100% busy during updates, then that's the cpu which is too
slow, not the disk.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]