bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSoC projects


From: Andrei Barbu
Subject: Re: GSoC projects
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:24:08 -0400

Hi,

Sorry for the delay in answering. Due to Comcast's incompetence I
don't have internet access at home until next week.

a) Instrumentation and a SystemTap port.
b) The instrumentation patches will make their way into mach, the
SystemTap work should probably go into its own git repository.




Thanks,
Andrei

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The GSoC projects are making good progress, as I read from various IRC
> log lines.  Hence, we'd like to make this work available through the
> standard GNU Savannah Hurd group/repository.  I'm going to make the
> GSoCers members of that group.  Here are some rules:
> <http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/rules/source_repositories/>
>
> So far, we'll grant you commit-after-approval permission, so please
> (continue to) post and discuss everything to bug-hurd that you'd like to
> have committed.  On your own tagged branches, you can do what you feel
> like (commit directly), but please also obey to the above rules.  Better
> to ask first, than trying to do something on your own.  (Remeber that
> whatever you do, it'll be part of the Hurd's permanent RCS history.)
>
> So, let me say this again: Thanks for your interest in the GNU Hurd and
> welcome on board!  :-)
>
>
> Now, I'd now like each of GSoCers post a follow-up to this message, and
> give a short overview of (a) what he's working on and (b) if this is
> rather a stand-alone thing or has to be included into the main Hurd
> repository.  If it's stand-alone I'd rather have it remain so and make up
> a separate module for it (might even use git or else for it instead of
> CVS, whatever people prefer).  If it has to be integrated into the main
> Hurd tree, then we have to make up some rules about how to do this.
>
>
> Regards,
>  Thomas
>
>
> PS: I'm going to work on the wiki issue today.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIlCDJgfzh735dTTURAv0JAJ40bUjP8jkfgqV/O1k5RECK1kOCYwCdHfwR
> haQEjLL7tgC3eVu6eGzWW+w=
> =AOj9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]