[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add the ``--mount'' command line option

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add the ``--mount'' command line option
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:01:05 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)


On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 07:01:37AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:14:56PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Also, I'd still stand for creating a ``stand-alone'' unionmount
> > translator
> That's definitely still an option, but I refuse to decide on that now.

OK, this is clear.
> > Note, that using something like settrans --unionmount could also solve
> > the argument parsing problem, since the mountee command line could be
> > parsed by settrans, then the mountee started by settrans, too, the
> > corresponding unioning translator being expected to only merge the
> > filesystems.
> While not a terribly good argument by itself, this is perhaps some
> indication that implementing it in settrans might indeed be the most
> natural approach...

It might be so, but I do agree that the choice of implementation
approach should be backed by more serious thinking.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]