[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving to git

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Moving to git
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:34:08 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:31:09AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

> > > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's
> > > commit messages +are valid.
> > 
> > Is it really *after*, or starting with?...
> > 
> > A less ambiguous wording would be preferable :-)
> Yes, I'm myself not entirely happy with the wording.
> e227 is the last CVS commit.  So indeed *after* that one the pure Git
> ones begin.  (Obviously we can't know the SHA1 of the commit
> to-be-created, so we can't use that one as ``starting with''.)  Or is
> there some flaw in my logic?

No, the logic is fine. It's just that everyone reading it will probably
have the same doubts...

Perhaps it helps to be more verbose? "commit e227045 is the last commit
imported from CVS. All commits created after that have correct


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]