[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:11:47 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:

> The best situation would be if the file handle could be easily
> avoided, on which matter I cannot comment right away without a deeper
> investigation of nfsd.  I think that avoiding file handles is worth
> the effort, but then I remember your words about a second level of
> directory structure to support NFS, which means that the effort might
> be pointless due to the fact that a file-handle-like structure is
> inherently necessary.

Indeed, I don't think it's likely that it can be avoided -- or otherwise
it wouldn't have been added in the first place...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]