Re: Unionmount: proxying the control port

[olafBuddenhagen]

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:

> The best situation would be if the file handle could be easily
> avoided, on which matter I cannot comment right away without a deeper
> investigation of nfsd.  I think that avoiding file handles is worth
> the effort, but then I remember your words about a second level of
> directory structure to support NFS, which means that the effort might
> be pointless due to the fact that a file-handle-like structure is
> inherently necessary.

Indeed, I don't think it's likely that it can be avoided -- or otherwise
it wouldn't have been added in the first place...

-antrik-