[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nsmux Documentation

From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: nsmux Documentation
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:23:24 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-hh2; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; )

Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2009 18:52:57 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Yes, this is the long-term goal, though I definitely won't advise you
> trying this out ATM -- one of the most important issues is security,
> about which nsmux does nothing but standard procedures, but it is
> possible that something more is required.

OK, thanks for your warning! 

Best wishes, 

PS: I think that to get people to do some more testing, a few easy to use 
examples (and one complex and powerful example) would be efficient - especially 
if they directly contain the shell commands to use (copy paste is always 
easiest) - as soon as the LiveCD is up to date again it could also get quite a 
few people to try the Hurd. 

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
Unpolitisch sein
hei├čt politisch sein, 
ohne es zu merken. 
- Arne (http://draketo.de)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]