[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unionmount branches

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: unionmount branches
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:10:42 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:21:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > According to what Thomas has suggested, I have pushed my code to the
> > unionfs git repository (git://git.sv.gnu.org/hurd/unionfs.git) in a
> > topic branch (master-unionmount).
> That's not a topic branch. Topic branches are essentially individual
> patch series. This is a traditional branch, containing a cumulative
> development history.

Aha, I see.  Sorry for misusing the term.
> While I do think that such main a "unionmount" branch is probably a good
> idea, it should contain only the "approved" patches; while those still
> in development would better be placed in true topic branches...

OK.  I'll stick to this in the future.  Shall I move the yet
not-completely-approved patches away from master-unionmount into
corresponding topic branches?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]