[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dash, PATH

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: dash, PATH
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:11:29 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:09:27AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jakub Daniel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 18:42:13 +0100, a écrit :

> > Unlike previous time I had to set /etc/fstab entirely by myself (all
> > lines were commented out and the content didn't reflect the real
> > partions).
> Odd, but shouldn't hurt, as passive translators replace /etc/fstab.

It's still necessary for fsck -a; and I think also for swapon -a?

I believe I could also come up with some obscure use cases where it
would still be useful to use fstab for mounting -- but I don't think
these really matter in the real world :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]