[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unionmount branches

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: unionmount branches
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:20:08 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:37:31AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:20:45PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Just to make sure: I can push the mount patch series (starting with
> > ``Add the --mount command line option'' to ``Add the mountee to the
> > list of merged filesystems'') to the unionmount branch in the
> > unionfs.git repository, right?
> Isn't that exactly what the existing master-unionmount branch is about /
> contains?  Or is that branch to be considered obsolete and you have a
> similar patch series that should be used instead?

antrik suggested that I put only the patch series to which he has
given a final acknowledge into the public repository.  Since the mount
patch series has just (seemingly) received this kind of acknowledge, I
think the branch should contain exactly this series.  (However, I must
also crawl about mail archive to see whether antrik has given a final
approval to anything else.)

> If the latter, then yes, publishing that under a different name (be
> it unionmount or be it master-unionmount-Mk_2 or whatever) is the
> correct thing to do.  Please also remove the then-obsolte branch:
>     $ git push savannah :master-unionmount

Yes, I will surely do that.  Thank you for information :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]