[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Many questions about translators

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Many questions about translators
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:57:26 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:

> Again, it seems like a natural split to me.  One translator per
> filesystem: one to merge the different packages into a single
> filesystem, and the other to interact with it.

I really don't see any point in introducing an arbitrary process boundry
here. It's not like you are actually splitting off any meaningful
functionality -- the extra node would just be a proxy. The extra
handling to set up that node would only add hassle to the user -- on top
of a lot of additional hassle for the implementation.

Better just handle it in the main process directly.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]