[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?

From: William Leslie
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:52:06 +1000

Wasn't the intention that the GNU partition type number be reserved for a future hurdish file system? What is the partition type number for, would that mean existing tools will refuse to work with it?

On 18/08/2010 7:46 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:


IIRC, the currently recommended way is to use partition type 83 (Linux)
just because the old debian installer only recognizes those.  Is there
any other reason which prevents us from using type 63 in the Debian


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100817213913.GB4814@const.famille.thibault.fr" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/20100817213913.GB4814@const.famille.thibault.fr

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]