[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New procfs implementation

From: Jeremie Koenig
Subject: Re: New procfs implementation
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:47:58 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:10:04PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeremie Koenig, le Sat 04 Sep 2010 01:07:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > How about "--default-owner" or "--default-uid" ?
> "default" could imply that it's used for much more cases than just this
> one.  What about "no-owner"?

Maybe "not-owned-uid" or "notowned-uid", in order to be consistent with
PI_NOTOWNED from <hurd/hurd_types.h> ?

Jeremie Koenig <jk@jk.fr.eu.org>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]