[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6

From: Svante Signell
Subject: Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:35:25 +0200

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 30 Mar 2011 09:18:05 +0200, a écrit :
> > (I don't think the problem is due to qemu-kvm?)
> Many problems do come from kvm actually. That's one of the reasons why I
> prefer to use Xen.
> > I can of course run the generated makefiles manually, but do not
> > generally know in which order to run them. The most annoying part is
> > that even if the libraries and executables are successfully built by
> > manual intervention, the build-stamp is not created. Does manually
> > creating it make dpkg-buildpackage happy to continue building the
> > package??

I have now tried compiling ghc6_6.10.1+dfsg1-{5,4,3} with
ghc6_6.8.2dfsg1-1.1,6.8.2dfsg1-1+hurd.1, 6.6.1-2 and they all hang at
the same place. I don't think this problem is qemu-related.

Below is the limited information provided by gdb:

gdb ghc6-6.10.1+dfsg1/libraries/cabal-bin
...long configure command there...
[New Thread 15613.5]
[New Thread 15613.6]
Configuring random-
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x011120dc in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
(gdb) bt
#0  0x011120dc in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
#1  0x012aa195 in io_read () from /lib/libhurduser.so.0.3
#2  0x01116b61 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
#3  0x0111da29 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
#4  0x011164ee in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
#5  0x011d3ce0 in read () from /lib/libc.so.0.3
#6  0x084919c8 in s9qJ_ret ()
#7  0x0861f842 in StgRun ()
#8  0x087c44e0 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

How to

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]