bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH.HURD] fix fdatasync/fsync if file_sync is not supported


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [PATCH.HURD] fix fdatasync/fsync if file_sync is not supported
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:07:02 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Pino Toscano, le Fri 26 Oct 2012 18:30:39 +0200, a écrit :
> Alle venerdì 26 ottobre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> > Svante Signell, le Fri 26 Oct 2012 08:03:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 19:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Roland McGrath, le Thu 25 Oct 2012 09:49:51 -0700, a écrit :
> > > > > We don't generally handle MIG_BAD_ID.  That error indicates a
> > > > > server not implementing the protocol for which it's being
> > > > > used, which is a server bug.
> > > > 
> > > > Pino, in which case did you actually get MIG_BAD_ID precisely?
> 
> with sample.c:
> int main()
> {
> fsync(STDOUT_FILENO)
> }
> $ ./sample | less

Oh?  I wonder how that produces MIG_BAD_ID: libtrivfs (used by pflocal)
is supposed to be returning EOPNOTSUPP when there is no underlying node,
which should be the case here.

> > (even if it's probably not right in going crazy if it doesn't return
> > EINVAL).
> 
> Well, one could note throwing an error value which is not even a POSIX 
> errno does not sound correct to send to userland.

AIUI, POSIX says there can be other, implementation-defined errors.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]