[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation

From: Pino Toscano
Subject: Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:17:06 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )


Alle lunedì 19 novembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> I don't think losing __UL_GETMAXBRK is really a problem.  The reason
> for removing it was not specific to Linux, just to the
> implementation being in a shared library.  It could be implemented
> in a shared library, at the cost of a GOT reloc for _etext to get
> the main executable's value (or conversely, perhaps some grovelling
> in dynamic linker data structures for the shared case).  But given
> that the current implementation usable on the Hurd will yield
> utterly useless values, the case for having it at all is
> inordinately weak.


Attached there are the two patches of the ulimit reorganization, as you 
suggested in a previous email:
1) move the linux implementation as posix (including limits.h)
2) remove the bsd implementation

Pino Toscano

Attachment: fix-ulimit-1.diff
Description: Text Data

Attachment: fix-ulimit-2.diff
Description: Text Data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]