[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finish

From: Svante Signell
Subject: Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finished
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:39:39 +0100

On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 00:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 00:18:16 +0100, a écrit :

> > > I don't understand what you mean.  What delay are you talking about?
> > > The only delay in by branch is the delay requested by the user.
> > 
> > Well, with my code I need a timeout of 1ms for poll, with the old code I
> > don't.
> That 1ms is completely got ridden of by Richard's changes. I don't
> understand what problem you are still seeing.

I know that Richards change solve the problem by moving the timeouts to
the server. I was referring to the current situation. I had to use 1ms
in the_io_select() call, while the old code worked without, when the
double timeout bug was fixed by moving the delay to the __mach_msg call
only and use zero in the _io_select timeout argument.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]