[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Make start_code and end_code available in /proc/*/stat

From: Richard Braun
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make start_code and end_code available in /proc/*/stat
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:23:54 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 00:24:59)
> > Mmm, I'm not sure whether we really want to introduce
> > proc_set_code/proc_get_code just for killall5.  We could just put
> > 0x08000000 / 0x09000000 values for non-essential processes.  What do you
> > think?
> To be honest, I spent most of the time on that part, thinking that the
> chances of getting this merged without discussion would improve if I
> just implement this instead of providing wrong values to appease
> killall5. Also, providing the correct values aligns our procfs more
> closely with the Linux one, and that is one of the points of our
> procfs, isn't it?

What's the problem with adding support for valid values ?

Richard Braun

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]