[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 7-9 (9)

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 7-9 (9)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:07:02 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel


I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't hurt even
if there is no occurrence...”

So just keep that precise part back as it was, no need for being clumsy.

What I however said was:

“Err, these seem to get applied to all systems, not just GNU/Hurd, isn't
that a concern?”

By that, I mean this:

> +# Special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK for GNU/Hurd
> +# /usr/include/bits/errno.h: #define EWOULDBLOCK EAGAIN
> +egrep '^const EWOULDBLOCK = Errno(_EWOULDBLOCK)' ${OUT} | \
> +    sed -i.bak -e 's/_EWOULDBLOCK/_EAGAIN/' ${OUT}
> +

and that:

> +# Special treatment of SYS_FCNTL for GNU/Hurd
> +if ! grep '^const SYS_FCNTL' ${OUT} >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> +  echo "const SYS_FCNTL = 0" >> ${OUT}
> +fi

AIUI, the patch you propose does those changes for all systems, not just
GNU/Hurd.  That most probably will pose a problem.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]