Re: Release process & rolling new releases

[Omar Radwan]

I would think that an annual release, or a release every 2 years, coupled with a snapshot every 2 month, would be the best for most people.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> skribis:

> I understand you took care of the release process last time.  Is this
> process documented somewhere?  I think that we should make another
> round of releases.  In fact, we should make one or two releases each
> year.  At the very least it brings us quite a bit of attention.
>
> If it's just a matter of doing this or that, please let me know how I
> can contribute to this process.

Excellent initiative!

It would be ideal (but maybe I’m asking for too much) if this would come
with a libc tarball as well, presumably based on the sv.gnu.org repo
rebased on the latest libc released.  In the short term that would be
helpful for Guix, and in the longer term that would help the project as
a whole I think.

Thanks,
Ludo’.