[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Static binaries and nss (dlopen actually)

From: Roland McGrath
Subject: Re: Static binaries and nss (dlopen actually)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:55:57 -0800 (PST)

> Roland McGrath, le Wed 18 Feb 2015 16:40:06 -0800, a ?crit :
> > The short answer is that it's pretty well hopeless.
> Ok, that's what I was feeling, thanks for the confirmation :)

Note this also means that features like dynamic linker namespaces and audit
modules are essentially unusable on the Hurd.  That is unfortunate (while
the fact that static linking usage that was already ill-advised is wholly
untenable does not actually bother me at all).  But changing this would
require a major overhaul and redesign of the entire client-side
implementation of the Hurd.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]