[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

From: Richard Braun
Subject: Re: new hurd & gnumach packages
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:33:22 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:33:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I got another hit, I have attached the screenshot, and here are the
> addrlines:

This is scary. Justus and I never saw anything wrong in a month
with regular builds of iceweasel/hurd/glibc packages, and you get
two assertions in a few days...

> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:97
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:66
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.c:233
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.h:94
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_object.c:660
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2300
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2408
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2512
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/mach_msg.c:1466

It looks like there is discrepancy between ipc/ipc_object.c:660 and
kern/rdxtree.h:94. Can you manage to get -O0 traces ?

Richard Braun

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]