[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: USB Mass Storage with rump

From: Olaf Buddenhagen
Subject: Re: USB Mass Storage with rump
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:28:38 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)


On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:57:03PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:

> single Rump instance inside a single translator which exposes all of
> /dev in Rump namespace somewhere under host /dev hierarchy (e.g.
> /dev/rump/*).

This is certainly tempting, but also dangerous -- once a somewhat
working solution is in place, there is less motivation to do the "right"

Note that besides going fully monolithic (as described above), or fully
modular (as you suggested originally), a compromise solution that is
monolitic on the vertical axis (all layers in one server), but modular
on the horizontal one (seperate instance for each device) is also a
possibility. I'm not saying it's necessarily the best choice -- but it's
an option to consider. Ultimately it depends on how much effort the
person implementing it is willing to invest...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]