[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rolling new releases
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Rolling new releases |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 02:17:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Hello,
Thanks for the pending patches notices!
David Michael, le Tue 06 Oct 2015 17:49:00 -0400, a écrit :
> This one avoids problems with a symbol that is also provided by libpthread:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/tg-libc_getspecific.diff?view=co
What problem does it actually solve? Apparently I didn't put enough
comments to remember what this is about. AIUI, it should be working
fine already since this non-weak __libc_getspecific function calls
cthread_getspecific, which calls pthread_getspecific.
> I haven't checked if there's a new Debian patch for this, but there is
> an IS_IN macro from the future (build failure) since commit 8042775.
> Use IS_IN_rtld instead:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/glibc.git/tree/sysdeps/mach/hurd/cthreads.c?h=tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker#n23
Ah, right, this patch was for 2.22. In Debian we have different versions
of this change according to the version. Since Whittaker is still based
on 2.19, I have added the fix.
> Also, I believe either you or Samuel told me at some point that
> task_notify should be built in libmachuser instead of the proc server.
Yes. I didn't realize the change was still not done in glibc. I've now
pushed to upstream and our topgit. I'll commit to Debian after a build
test (for the new symbols).
> and you can drop Debian's Hurd patch?
Yes.
> (Note to packagers that this will make glibc install a new file,
> <mach/task_notify.h>.)
That's not a problem.
Thanks,
Samuel
more clocks (was: Rolling new releases), Justus Winter, 2015/10/08
Re: Rolling new releases, Manolis Ragkousis, 2015/10/08
Re: Rolling new releases, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/09
Re: Rolling new releases, Justus Winter, 2015/10/26