[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port()
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port() |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Nov 2015 20:03:02 +0100 |
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Diego Nieto Cid, on Wed 04 Nov 2015 10:50:35 -0300, wrote:
> > assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL)
> >
> > AIUI any other values are bogus given how 'mig_get_reply_port' and
> > 'mig_dealloc_reply_port' are meant to be paired.
>
> That's probably a good thing to do, yes.
What's wrong with?
mach_port_t port = __hurd_local_reply_port;
assert (port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL)
Additionally, any strong reason to not change mig??
- Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Svante Signell, 2015/11/03
- Message not available
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Svante Signell, 2015/11/04
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Diego Nieto Cid, 2015/11/04
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Samuel Thibault, 2015/11/04
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(),
Svante Signell <=
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Samuel Thibault, 2015/11/04
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Diego Nieto Cid, 2015/11/04
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Svante Signell, 2015/11/05
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Pino Toscano, 2015/11/05
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Svante Signell, 2015/11/05
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Samuel Thibault, 2015/11/06
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Svante Signell, 2015/11/06
- Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port(), Samuel Thibault, 2015/11/06