bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Cast kernel server call arguments to the correct type when m


From: Justus Winter
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cast kernel server call arguments to the correct type when mach_port_t and ipc_port_t are used interchangeably
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:11:44 +0100
User-agent: alot/0.3.7.dev1

Quoting Flavio Cruz (2015-12-30 18:03:58)
> This fixes a warning when compiling the mig generated file
> gnumach/kern/mach4.server.c. Here, an ipc_port_t* is passed to a
> function that expects a mach_port_t* (In0P->object). Since mig uses
> mach_port_t and ipc_port_t interchangeably in kernel interfaces, we need
> to use casts to make GCC happy.

Are you thinking of this issue:

  kern/mach4.server.c: In function ‘_Xmemory_object_create_proxy’:
  kern/mach4.server.c:691:73: warning: passing argument 3 of 
‘memory_object_create_proxy’ from incompatible pointer type 
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  OutP->RetCode = memory_object_create_proxy(task, In0P->max_protection, 
In0P->object, In0P->objectType.msgt_number, In1P->offset, 
In1P->offsetType.msgt_number, In2P->start, In2P->startType.msgt_number, 
In3P->len, In3P->lenType.msgt_number, &OutP->proxy);
  kern/mach4.server.c:585:29: note: expected ‘memory_object_array_t {aka long 
unsigned int *}’ but argument is of type ‘struct ipc_port **’
  mig_external kern_return_t memory_object_create_proxy

?

I've been wondering about that, but didn't took a closer look.  I
always assumed that this is due to MatchMakers poor type support.

Cheers,
Justus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]