[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:12:15 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)


Agustina Arzille, on Mon 09 May 2016 22:45:17 -0300, wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 07:42 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested.
> I did try that, and got farther than before (Thanks, Richard!). On the other
> hand, glibc's testsuite failed during math/tgmath2, after a crash.

Just to make sure: are you building the debian package, or from our
hurd/glibc.git tree?  In the debian package at least, the testsuite
should be going on, and give a regression summary: quite a few tests are
"expected" to fail. tgmath2 is however not in the list. Did you check
that it did not fail without your patch?

> Oh, right. Well, we would need to change something in gnumach for that, right?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]