Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

bug-hurd

From:	Samuel Thibault
Subject:	Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 11:34:49 +0200
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Oh, that reminds me, now that we have gsync, we could add a proper
GSCOPE implementation in tls.h, see i386's implementation.

Samuel

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/05
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/06
  - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/06
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Richard Braun, 2016/05/07
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/08
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/09
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/10
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/10
    - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/13
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2016/05/09
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault <=
  - Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/13