[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:00:23 +0100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

Joseph Myers, on jeu. 18 janv. 2018 16:47:55 +0000, wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Not all of them are necessary for managing to build glibc. Some of them
> > are just hacking, others are perhaps almost ready to commit, just
> > missing changelogs & formatting. That's the triaging thing that takes
> > time, and having to do all the work including changelogs & formatting
> > makes it get lower in my global TODOlist.
> I'm still arguing on bug-standards for removing the requirement for 
> ChangeLog format (given a public distributed version control system), but 
> that wouldn't remove the requirement for proper explanations of patches, 

Thomas: this is were your help should be focused. Some of your branches
only have "WIP", which is not helpful to know what you were hacking when
writing them.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]