Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack

[Samuel Thibault]

Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 13:19:52 +0100, a ecrit:
> Svante Signell, le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 12:11:25 +0100, a ecrit:
> > However, all these tests are still failing, but now mainly with SIGABRT or
> > "signal 20 (SIGCHLD) received but handler not on signal stack" or "signal 30
> > (SIGUSR1) received but handler not on signal stack".
> > 
> > So I think there are still more bugs to hunt down.
> 
> Yep, but there is most probably some progress here, and possibly it'll
> be easier to track down such explicit abort than a SIGILL from out of
> space.

I guess this is printed from ./src/libgo/runtime/go-signal.c? It'd be
useful to dump the content of st and print sp.

Samuel