[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rumpdisk status
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: rumpdisk status |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:12:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 09 nov. 2020 20:06:28 +0100, a ecrit:
> I'd say track the offset within the pread calls, to make sure that it is
> not getting lost along the path.
Also, I'd say put prints around the pread and pwrite calls. Actually now
realizing that rumpdisk is for now single-threaded, they shouldn't even
be getting intermixed at all.
Btw, is your second partition within small bounds? (e.g. within 4GiB
that can be expressed with 32bit integers)
Samuel
- rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/07
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/07
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/07
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/07
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/08
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/09
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/10
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/10
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/10
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/13
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/23
- Re: rumpdisk status, Damien Zammit, 2020/11/23
- Re: rumpdisk status, Samuel Thibault, 2020/11/24