[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 11/11] remove gnumach_i686 issue.

From: guy fleury iteriteka
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] remove gnumach_i686 issue.
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 12:12:17 +0200

* open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn: delete it.
 open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn | 26 --------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn

diff --git a/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn b/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index b34df73..0000000
--- a/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright ?? 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-[[!tag open_issue_gnumach]]
-# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-05
-    <braunr> we could use a gnumach-i686 too
-    <pinotree> how would you compile gnumach as i686 variant btw? add
-      -march=.. or something like that in CFLAGS?
-    <braunr> yes
-    <braunr> at least we'll get some cmovs :)
-## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-07
-    <braunr> it was rejected in the past because we didn't think it would bring
-      real performance benefit, but it actually may

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]