[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new interface: memory_object_get_proxy
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:02:39 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

I forgot to answer this:

Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 30 oct. 2021 15:06:30 +0300, a ecrit:
> > > Should the implementation cap the length to that of the entry
> > > silently, or should it return an error if called with an overly long
> > > len argument?
> > >
> >
> > I don't know, Samuel, what do you think?
> Actually now that I think about it, it would probably make sense for
> this to, some day, transparently support proxying multiple regions,
> which is something that the memory object proxies API supports in
> theory (but it's currently unimplemented). So maybe it should return a
> "not yet supported" error for now.

Yes, though we don't have such error, but KERN_INVALID_ARGUMENT would be
fine enough.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]