[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64bit startup

From: Sergey Bugaev
Subject: Re: 64bit startup
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 21:12:05 +0300


On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 8:16 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> I continued stabbing at the network issue, it was just a size alignment
> problem, so that depending on their sizes, half of the network packets
> would be discarded by mach_msg. Hurd-amd64 packages are getting rebuilt
> to contain the fix.


> The issue I'm still seeing now is that I cannot get to install some
> packages, such as libicu72. When I pass it as extra package to
> debootstrap, it does get installed, but when I "dpkg -i" it by hand,
> things halt.
> And there is still the 64bit change proposed proposed by Flavio that
> needs to get reviewed.

There's another issue we need to sort out: is it OK for Debian to ship
glibc 2.36 whose symbols claim to be GLIBC_2.38? It doesn't look like
there's been any compat symbols (as in SHLIB_COMPAT / compat_symbol)
added in between, but programs built against actual glibc 2.38 link
against newer symbols that just aren't present in 2.36 (such as those
__isoc23 functions), and you get symbol errors at runtime, instead of
the usual error about the required version not being present. Could
there be other side effects?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]