[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit startup
From: |
jbranso |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit startup |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:52:02 +0000 |
October 25, 2023 3:43 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> jbranso@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 03:40:16 +0000, a ecrit:
>
>> Or maybe GCC is partly at fault for the
>> Hurd's X86_64 building troubles?
>
> It's not at all. Nor is libtool.
>
> I occasionally had issues in ./configure, too.
>
> You'll say that's "yeah, it's all about auto-crap". No.
>
> It's *very* most probably about bash, simply.
>
> Samuel
Hmmm. I guess in the long-term then, the bash issues should be fixed.
Could we change the default shell on X86_64 Debian Hurd in the meantime,
as a temporary solution? Or is that a silly suggestion? I assume the ksh
shell is simplier, mainly because that is the default shell in OpenBSD.
Also, this is coming from someone who has yet to try the 64 bit Hurd. I
should really fire up qemu and give it a try.
Joshua
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Jeffrey Walton, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Jessica Clarke, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Jeffrey Walton, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Jessica Clarke, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Jeffrey Walton, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, jbranso, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup,
jbranso <=
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/29
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/30
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/30
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/31
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/31
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/10/31